| Title |
Supervised maintenance programmes following pulmonary rehabilitation compared to usual care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013569.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carla Malaguti, Simone Dal Corso, Sadia Janjua, Anne E Holland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Tuvalu | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 13% |
| Scientists | 5 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 170 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 84 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 13% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 89 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,353,865
of 24,853,509 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,961
of 12,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,905
of 424,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,853,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.