↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Addition of intravenous beta2-agonists to inhaled beta2-agonists for acute asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Addition of intravenous beta2-agonists to inhaled beta2-agonists for acute asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew H Travers, Stephen J Milan, Arthur P Jones, Carlos A Camargo Jr, Brian H Rowe

Abstract

Inhaled beta-agonist therapy is central to the management of acute asthma. This review evaluates the benefit of an additional use of intravenous beta(2)-agonist agents.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 204 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 15%
Researcher 23 11%
Other 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 74 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 81 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,114,137
of 20,795,473 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,687
of 12,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,111
of 286,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,795,473 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.