The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Impact of diagnostic strategies for tuberculosis using lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan assay in people living with HIV
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014641 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruvandhi R Nathavitharana, Philip Lederer, Marty Chaplin, Stephanie Bjerrum, Karen R Steingart, Maunank Shah |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Comoros | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 76 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 86 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,472,754
of 26,149,954 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,838
of 13,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,640
of 440,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#110
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,149,954 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.