↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Impact of diagnostic strategies for tuberculosis using lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan assay in people living with HIV

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Impact of diagnostic strategies for tuberculosis using lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan assay in people living with HIV
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014641
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruvandhi R Nathavitharana, Philip Lederer, Marty Chaplin, Stephanie Bjerrum, Karen R Steingart, Maunank Shah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 146 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 10%
Other 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Student > Master 9 6%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 72 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Unspecified 5 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 81 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,399,984
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,791
of 13,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,933
of 439,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.