↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for actinic keratoses

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
432 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for actinic keratoses
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004415.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aditya K Gupta, Maryse Paquet, Elmer Villanueva, William Brintnell

Abstract

Actinic keratoses are a skin disease caused by long-term sun exposure, and their lesions have the potential to develop into squamous cell carcinoma. Treatments for actinic keratoses are sought for cosmetic reasons, for the relief of associated symptoms, or for the prevention of skin cancer development. Detectable lesions are often associated with alteration of the surrounding skin (field) where subclinical lesions might be present. The interventions available for the treatment of actinic keratoses include individual lesion-based (e.g. cryotherapy) or field-directed (e.g. topical) treatments. These might vary in terms of efficacy, safety, and cosmetic outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 422 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 77 18%
Student > Bachelor 54 13%
Researcher 52 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 9%
Student > Postgraduate 26 6%
Other 85 20%
Unknown 97 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 182 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 4%
Psychology 16 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 3%
Other 57 13%
Unknown 116 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,021,917
of 21,859,856 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,472
of 12,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,273
of 293,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#194
of 458 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,859,856 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 458 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.