↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for actinic keratoses

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
474 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for actinic keratoses
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004415.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aditya K Gupta, Maryse Paquet, Elmer Villanueva, William Brintnell

Abstract

Actinic keratoses are a skin disease caused by long-term sun exposure, and their lesions have the potential to develop into squamous cell carcinoma. Treatments for actinic keratoses are sought for cosmetic reasons, for the relief of associated symptoms, or for the prevention of skin cancer development. Detectable lesions are often associated with alteration of the surrounding skin (field) where subclinical lesions might be present. The interventions available for the treatment of actinic keratoses include individual lesion-based (e.g. cryotherapy) or field-directed (e.g. topical) treatments. These might vary in terms of efficacy, safety, and cosmetic outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 474 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 464 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 17%
Student > Bachelor 61 13%
Researcher 52 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 6%
Other 90 19%
Unknown 117 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 194 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 4%
Psychology 16 3%
Other 57 12%
Unknown 136 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,477,116
of 25,385,864 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,092
of 12,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,768
of 288,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.