| Title |
Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001241.pub8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sam J Oddie, Lauren Young, William McGuire |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 13% |
| Turkey | 2 | 5% |
| Chile | 2 | 5% |
| Botswana | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 49% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 33% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 207 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 20 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 79 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 34% |
| Unspecified | 20 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 84 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2022.
All research outputs
#972,958
of 24,138,997 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,047
of 12,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,535
of 419,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,138,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.