↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
39 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
Title
Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001241.pub8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam J Oddie, Lauren Young, William McGuire

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Unknown 252 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 11%
Researcher 23 9%
Other 22 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Student > Bachelor 13 5%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 123 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Unspecified 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 130 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#952,949
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,885
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,929
of 434,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.