↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Autologous chondrocyte implantation for full thickness articular cartilage defects of the knee

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Autologous chondrocyte implantation for full thickness articular cartilage defects of the knee
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003323.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haris S Vasiliadis, Jason Wasiak

Abstract

Treatments for managing articular cartilage defects of the knee, including drilling and abrasion arthroplasty, are not always effective. When they are, long-term benefits may not be maintained and osteoarthritis may develop. An alternative is autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), the surgical implantation of healthy cartilage cells into the damaged areas.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 252 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 20%
Researcher 38 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 13%
Other 22 8%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Other 61 23%
Unknown 34 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 129 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Engineering 9 3%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 53 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,554,507
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,477
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,834
of 255,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#352
of 434 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 434 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.