↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the adjunctive treatment of traumatic brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the adjunctive treatment of traumatic brain injury
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004609.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael H Bennett, Barbara Trytko, Benjamin Jonker

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury is a common health problem with significant effect on quality of life. Each year in the USA approximately 0.56% of the population suffer a head injury, with a case fatality rate of about 40% for severe injuries. These account for a high proportion of deaths in young adults. In the USA, 2% of the population live with long-term disabilities following head injuries. The major causes are motor vehicle crashes, falls, and violence (including attempted suicide). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is the therapeutic administration of 100% oxygen at environmental pressures greater than 1 atmosphere absolute (ATA). This involves placing the patient in an airtight vessel, increasing the pressure within that vessel, and administering 100% oxygen for respiration. In this way, it is possible to deliver a greatly increased partial pressure of oxygen to the tissues. HBOT can improve oxygen supply to the injured brain, reduce the swelling associated with low oxygen levels and reduce the volume of brain that will ultimately perish. It is, therefore, possible that adding HBOT to the standard intensive care regimen may reduce patient death and disability. However, a concern for patients and families is that using HBOT may result in preventing a patient from dying only to leave them in a vegetative state, entirely dependent on medical care. There are also some potential adverse effects of the therapy, including damage to the ears, sinuses and lungs from the effects of the pressure and oxygen poisoning, so the benefits and risks of the therapy need to be carefully evaluated.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 168 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 5%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 39%
Psychology 20 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 37 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2018.
All research outputs
#528,658
of 17,392,251 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,256
of 11,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,802
of 263,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 488 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,392,251 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 488 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.