| Title |
Interventions to facilitate return to work in adults with adjustment disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006389.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iris Arends, David J Bruinvels, David S Rebergen, Karen Nieuwenhuijsen, Ira Madan, Angela Neumeyer‐Gromen, Ute Bültmann, Jos H Verbeek |
| Abstract |
Adjustment disorders are a frequent cause of sick leave and various interventions have been developed to expedite the return to work (RTW) of individuals on sick leave due to adjustment disorders. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 563 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 553 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 104 | 18% |
| Researcher | 81 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 6% |
| Other | 97 | 17% |
| Unknown | 121 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 136 | 24% |
| Psychology | 118 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 71 | 13% |
| Unknown | 146 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,913,922
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,637
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,186
of 291,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.