↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Image‐guided glucocorticoid injection versus injection without image guidance for shoulder pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
85 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Image‐guided glucocorticoid injection versus injection without image guidance for shoulder pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009147.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua Zadro, Adam Rischin, Renea V Johnston, Rachelle Buchbinder

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Master 11 9%
Other 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 64 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Unspecified 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 70 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#728,791
of 26,149,954 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,287
of 13,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,332
of 438,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,149,954 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.