↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for recruiting smokers into cessation programmes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for recruiting smokers into cessation programmes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009187.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

José S Marcano Belisario, Michelle N Bruggeling, Laura H Gunn, Serena Brusamento, Josip Car

Abstract

Tobacco control is a top public health priority around the globe due to the high prevalence of cigarette smoking and its associated morbidity and mortality. Much effort has been focused on establishing the effectiveness of different smoking cessation strategies. This review, however, aims to address the initial challenge faced by smoking cessation programmes: recruitment of smokers.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 220 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 19%
Researcher 40 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 47 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 12%
Psychology 24 11%
Social Sciences 21 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 50 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#8,382,633
of 14,780,221 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,791
of 11,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,973
of 252,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#404
of 495 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,780,221 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 495 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.