↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Short versus long feeding interval for bolus feedings in very preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Short versus long feeding interval for bolus feedings in very preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012322.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nor Rosidah Ibrahim, Hans Van Rostenberghe, Jacqueline J Ho, Ariffin Nasir

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 13 59%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,562,571
of 19,225,771 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,297
of 11,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,214
of 325,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,225,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.