↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dietary interventions for multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
Title
Dietary interventions for multiple sclerosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004192.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariangela Farinotti, Laura Vacchi, Silvana Simi, Carlo Di Pietrantonj, Lorenzo Brait, Graziella Filippini

Abstract

Clinical and experimental data suggest that certain dietary regimens, particularly those including polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and vitamins, might improve outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Diets and dietary supplements are much used by people with MS in the belief that they might improve disease outcomes and overcome the effectiveness limits of conventional treatments.This is an update of the Cochrane review "Dietary intervention for multiple sclerosis" (first published on The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 2%
Australia 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 182 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 21%
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 13%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 9%
Neuroscience 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 39 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2021.
All research outputs
#498,761
of 18,846,561 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,088
of 11,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,483
of 241,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,846,561 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.