↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dietary interventions for multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
Title
Dietary interventions for multiple sclerosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004192.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariangela Farinotti, Laura Vacchi, Silvana Simi, Carlo Di Pietrantonj, Lorenzo Brait, Graziella Filippini

Abstract

Clinical and experimental data suggest that certain dietary regimens, particularly those including polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and vitamins, might improve outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Diets and dietary supplements are much used by people with MS in the belief that they might improve disease outcomes and overcome the effectiveness limits of conventional treatments.This is an update of the Cochrane review "Dietary intervention for multiple sclerosis" (first published on The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 2%
Australia 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 211 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 49 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 9%
Neuroscience 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 64 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2021.
All research outputs
#670,157
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,182
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,642
of 288,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.