↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
63 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
241 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000016.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Jefferson, Melanie Rudin, Suzanne Brodney Folse, Frank Davidoff

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 4 2%
Netherlands 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Unknown 186 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 14%
Student > Master 20 10%
Other 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Other 44 22%
Unknown 35 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 32%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Psychology 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Other 42 21%
Unknown 46 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2022.
All research outputs
#378,676
of 25,376,646 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#655
of 13,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#559
of 85,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,376,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.