↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
285 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
487 Mendeley
Title
Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004950.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prakeshkumar S Shah, Cecilia Herbozo, Lucia Liz Aliwalas, Vibhuti S Shah

Abstract

Physiological changes brought about by pain may contribute to the development of morbidity in neonates. Clinical studies have shown reduction in changes in physiological parameters and pain score measurements following pre-emptive analgesic administration in situations where the neonate is experiencing pain or stress. Non-pharmacological measures (such as holding, swaddling and breastfeeding) and pharmacological measures (such as acetaminophen, sucrose and opioids) have been used for this purpose.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 487 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 478 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 14%
Student > Bachelor 66 14%
Researcher 46 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 7%
Student > Postgraduate 31 6%
Other 91 19%
Unknown 150 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 152 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 107 22%
Psychology 14 3%
Social Sciences 11 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 33 7%
Unknown 161 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2022.
All research outputs
#568,043
of 25,388,353 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,030
of 12,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,825
of 285,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,353 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.