↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
194 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
373 Mendeley
Title
Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004950.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prakeshkumar S Shah, Cecilia Herbozo, Lucia Liz Aliwalas, Vibhuti S Shah

Abstract

Physiological changes brought about by pain may contribute to the development of morbidity in neonates. Clinical studies have shown reduction in changes in physiological parameters and pain score measurements following pre-emptive analgesic administration in situations where the neonate is experiencing pain or stress. Non-pharmacological measures (such as holding, swaddling and breastfeeding) and pharmacological measures (such as acetaminophen, sucrose and opioids) have been used for this purpose.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 364 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 17%
Student > Bachelor 57 15%
Researcher 43 12%
Student > Postgraduate 30 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 8%
Other 83 22%
Unknown 67 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 97 26%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Psychology 10 3%
Other 29 8%
Unknown 78 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2020.
All research outputs
#373,048
of 16,713,463 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#846
of 11,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,050
of 262,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 504 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,713,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 504 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.