The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Physiological track‐and‐trigger/early warning systems for use in maternity care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013276.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valerie Smith, Louise C Kenny, Jane Sandall, Declan Devane, Maria Noonan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| Ireland | 4 | 9% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 34 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 76% |
| Scientists | 6 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Researcher | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Unknown | 122 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 128 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,158,056
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,354
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,056
of 436,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.