The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003030.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louise Forsetlund, Mary Ann O'Brien, Lisa Forsén, Leah Mwai, Liv Merete Reinar, Mbah P Okwen, Tanya Horsley, Christopher J Rose |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cameroon | 7 | 18% |
| South Africa | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Mauritius | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 76% |
| Scientists | 7 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 470 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 468 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 11% |
| Researcher | 37 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 91 | 19% |
| Unknown | 205 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 16 | 3% |
| Psychology | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 63 | 13% |
| Unknown | 220 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2024.
All research outputs
#758,928
of 26,222,113 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,338
of 13,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,768
of 438,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,222,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.