↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
40 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
Title
Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003030.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise Forsetlund, Mary Ann O'Brien, Lisa Forsén, Leah Mwai, Liv Merete Reinar, Mbah P Okwen, Tanya Horsley, Christopher J Rose

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 264 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 11%
Researcher 20 8%
Other 12 5%
Student > Bachelor 11 4%
Other 49 18%
Unknown 109 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 14%
Social Sciences 15 6%
Psychology 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 119 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#687,234
of 23,207,489 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,378
of 12,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,062
of 429,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,207,489 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.