| Title |
Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003030.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louise Forsetlund, Mary Ann O'Brien, Lisa Forsén, Leah Mwai, Liv Merete Reinar, Mbah P Okwen, Tanya Horsley, Christopher J Rose |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cameroon | 9 | 24% |
| Japan | 4 | 11% |
| South Africa | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Mauritius | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 76% |
| Scientists | 7 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 435 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 433 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 8% |
| Researcher | 35 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 72 | 17% |
| Unknown | 194 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 58 | 13% |
| Unknown | 209 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
#763,023
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,434
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,187
of 434,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.