↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Instruments for assisted vaginal birth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Instruments for assisted vaginal birth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005455.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ganga L Verma, Jessica J Spalding, Marc D Wilkinson, G Justus Hofmeyr, Valerie Vannevel, Fidelma O'Mahony

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 4%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 52 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Design 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 52 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,282,440
of 24,356,663 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,843
of 12,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,099
of 423,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,356,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.