The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001560.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M Cucherat, E Bonnefoy, G Tremeau |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 27% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 42% |
| Psychology | 2 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2013.
All research outputs
#9,014,342
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,822
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,171
of 53,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.