↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001560.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michel Cucherat, Guillaume G Tremeau

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Psychology 2 11%
Computer Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2013.
All research outputs
#6,160,955
of 18,957,622 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,390
of 11,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,631
of 168,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,957,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.