↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mobile phone messaging for preventive health care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
22 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1344 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Mobile phone messaging for preventive health care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007457.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vlasta Vodopivec-Jamsek, Thyra de Jongh, Ipek Gurol-Urganci, Rifat Atun, Josip Car

Abstract

Preventive health care promotes health and prevents disease or injuries by addressing factors that lead to the onset of a disease, and by detecting latent conditions to reduce or halt their progression. Many risk factors for costly and disabling conditions (such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes, and chronic respiratory diseases) can be prevented, yet healthcare systems do not make the best use of their available resources to support this process. Mobile phone messaging applications, such as Short Message Service (SMS) and Multimedia Message Service (MMS), could offer a convenient and cost-effective way to support desirable health behaviours for preventive health care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 <1%
United Kingdom 9 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 11 <1%
Unknown 1303 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 243 18%
Researcher 217 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 183 14%
Student > Bachelor 116 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 89 7%
Other 280 21%
Unknown 216 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 431 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 166 12%
Psychology 112 8%
Social Sciences 102 8%
Computer Science 59 4%
Other 199 15%
Unknown 275 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,018,715
of 21,469,099 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,362
of 12,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,551
of 293,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 478 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,469,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 478 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.