↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus surgery for cervical cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus surgery for cervical cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007406.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Larysa Rydzewska, Jayne Tierney, Claire L Vale, Paul R Symonds

Abstract

A previous systematic review found that giving neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery improved survival compared with radiotherapy. However, the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone is still unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 56 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 58 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2013.
All research outputs
#7,111,435
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,733
of 12,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,413
of 278,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#124
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.