| Title |
Telehealthcare for asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007717.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susannah McLean, David Chandler, Ulugbek Nurmatov, Joseph LY Liu, Claudia Pagliari, Josip Car, Aziz Sheikh |
| Abstract |
Healthcare systems internationally need to consider new models of care to cater for the increasing numbers of people with asthma. Telehealthcare interventions are increasingly being seen by policymakers as a potential means of delivering asthma care. We defined telehealthcare as being healthcare delivered from a distance, facilitated electronically and involving the exchange of information through the personalised interaction between a healthcare professional using their skills and judgement and the patient providing information. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 409 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 77 | 18% |
| Researcher | 52 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 71 | 17% |
| Unknown | 117 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 125 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 12% |
| Psychology | 23 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 59 | 14% |
| Unknown | 129 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,405,136
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,229
of 12,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,904
of 99,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.