↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Telehealthcare for asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
438 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Telehealthcare for asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007717.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susannah McLean, David Chandler, Ulugbek Nurmatov, Joseph LY Liu, Claudia Pagliari, Josip Car, Aziz Sheikh

Abstract

Healthcare systems internationally need to consider new models of care to cater for the increasing numbers of people with asthma. Telehealthcare interventions are increasingly being seen by policymakers as a potential means of delivering asthma care. We defined telehealthcare as being healthcare delivered from a distance, facilitated electronically and involving the exchange of information through the personalised interaction between a healthcare professional using their skills and judgement and the patient providing information.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 438 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 426 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 77 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 13%
Researcher 54 12%
Student > Bachelor 39 9%
Student > Postgraduate 18 4%
Other 69 16%
Unknown 126 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 12%
Psychology 24 5%
Social Sciences 22 5%
Computer Science 13 3%
Other 55 13%
Unknown 141 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,675,489
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,578
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,711
of 108,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.