↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fornix‐based versus limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Fornix‐based versus limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009380.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex B Theventhiran, Gene Kim, WenJeng Yao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 13%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 3 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 45 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 49 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,078,736
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,446
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,111
of 434,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#110
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.