↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009380.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex B. Theventhiran, Gene Kim, WenJeng Yao

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 29%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Psychology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 7 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,263,574
of 19,280,406 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,451
of 11,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,291
of 280,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,280,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.