Title |
Fornix‐based versus limbal‐based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009380.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alex B Theventhiran, Gene Kim, WenJeng Yao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 41 | 59% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
Psychology | 2 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 45 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,078,736
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,446
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,111
of 434,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#110
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.