↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013362.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tin Nadarevic, Vanja Giljaca, Agostino Colli, Mirella Fraquelli, Giovanni Casazza, Damir Miletic, Davor Štimac

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Other 7 13%
Student > Master 6 12%
Researcher 3 6%
Professor 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 24 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 27%
Psychology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 28 54%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,179,473
of 22,464,753 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,019
of 12,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,632
of 352,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,464,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.