↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000126.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amaraporn Rerkasem, Saritphat Orrapin, Dominic PJ Howard, Sothida Nantakool, Kittipan Rerkasem

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 109 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 9 8%
Unspecified 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 45 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 30%
Unspecified 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 52 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,140,407
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,719
of 12,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,587
of 435,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#114
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.