↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000126.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amaraporn Rerkasem, Saritphat Orrapin, Dominic Pj Howard, Sothida Nantakool, Kittipan Rerkasem

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 147 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Master 12 8%
Other 12 8%
Researcher 10 7%
Professor 6 4%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 71 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Unspecified 4 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 80 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,640,680
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,937
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,749
of 437,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.