| Title |
Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000126.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amaraporn Rerkasem, Saritphat Orrapin, Dominic Pj Howard, Sothida Nantakool, Kittipan Rerkasem |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 145 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 65 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 26% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 73 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,640,680
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,937
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,749
of 437,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.