| Title |
Materials for retrograde filling in root canal therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005517.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Honglin Li, Zhiyong Guo, Chunjie Li, Xiangyu Ma, Yan Wang, Xuedong Zhou, Trevor M Johnson, Dingming Huang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 13% |
| Chile | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 33% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,798,696
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,877
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,249
of 438,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.