↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Symphysiotomy for feto-pelvic disproportion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
Title
Symphysiotomy for feto-pelvic disproportion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005299.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

G Justus Hofmeyr, P Mike Shweni

Abstract

Symphysiotomy is an operation in which the fibres of the pubic symphysis are partially divided to allow separation of the joint and thus enlargement of the pelvic dimensions during childbirth. It is performed with local analgesia and does not require an operating theatre nor advanced surgical skills. It may be a lifesaving procedure for the mother or the baby, or both, in several clinical situations. These include: failure to progress in labour when caesarean section is unavailable, unsafe or declined by the mother; and obstructed birth of the aftercoming head of a breech presenting baby. Criticism of the operation because of complications, particularly pelvic instability, and as being a 'second best' option has resulted in its decline or disappearance from use in many countries. Several large observational studies have reported high rates of success, low rates of complications and very low mortality rates.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 182 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 44 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Social Sciences 15 8%
Psychology 8 4%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 46 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,854,485
of 22,489,892 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,142
of 12,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,703
of 171,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,489,892 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.