↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Symphysiotomy for feto‐pelvic disproportion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Symphysiotomy for feto‐pelvic disproportion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005299.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

G Justus Hofmeyr, P Mike Shweni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 213 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 71 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 9%
Social Sciences 16 7%
Psychology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 73 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2024.
All research outputs
#795,123
of 25,983,245 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,427
of 13,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,458
of 194,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,983,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.