↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors for people with cardiovascular disease: a network meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
49 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors for people with cardiovascular disease: a network meta‐analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013650.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takayoshi Kanie, Atsushi Mizuno, Yoshimitsu Takaoka, Takahiro Suzuki, Daisuke Yoneoka, Yuri Nishikawa, Wilson Wai San Tam, Jakub Morze, Andrzej Rynkiewicz, Yiqiao Xin, Olivia Wu, Rui Providencia, Joey Sw Kwong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 176 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 9 5%
Researcher 8 5%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 98 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 104 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#865,921
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,658
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,348
of 444,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.