| Title |
Mammographic density, endocrine therapy and breast cancer risk: a prognostic and predictive biomarker review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013091.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma C Atakpa, Mangesh A Thorat, Jack Cuzick, Adam R Brentnall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Spain | 2 | 12% |
| Austria | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 28% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,864,819
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,546
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,843
of 445,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.