| Title |
Interrupted versus uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy for catheter ablation in adults with arrhythmias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013504.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ghada A Bawazeer, Hadeel A Alkofide, Aya A Alsharafi, Nada O Babakr, Arwa M Altorkistani, Tarek S Kashour, Michael Miligkos, Khalid M AlFaleh, Lubna A Al-Ansary |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 62 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 70 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,756,506
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,450
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,430
of 442,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.