↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interrupted versus uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy for catheter ablation in adults with arrhythmias

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Interrupted versus uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy for catheter ablation in adults with arrhythmias
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013504.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ghada A Bawazeer, Hadeel A Alkofide, Aya A Alsharafi, Nada O Babakr, Arwa M Altorkistani, Tarek S Kashour, Michael Miligkos, Khalid M AlFaleh, Lubna A Al-Ansary

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 8 10%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 40 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 45 58%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,427,061
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,078
of 12,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,459
of 439,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.