| Title |
Interrupted versus uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy for catheter ablation in adults with arrhythmias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013504.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ghada A Bawazeer, Hadeel A Alkofide, Aya A Alsharafi, Nada O Babakr, Arwa M Altorkistani, Tarek S Kashour, Michael Miligkos, Khalid M AlFaleh, Lubna A Al-Ansary |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 51 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 57 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,427,061
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,078
of 12,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,459
of 439,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.