| Title |
Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long-term bladder conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006008.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacqui A Prieto, Catherine L Murphy, Fiona Stewart, Mandy Fader |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 47 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,297,685
of 24,486,486 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,806
of 12,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,520
of 432,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,486,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.