↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long-term bladder conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long-term bladder conditions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006008.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqui A Prieto, Catherine L Murphy, Fiona Stewart, Mandy Fader

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 44 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Psychology 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 47 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,297,685
of 24,486,486 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,806
of 12,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,520
of 432,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,486,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.