↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long-term bladder conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long-term bladder conditions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006008.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqui A Prieto, Catherine L Murphy, Fiona Stewart, Mandy Fader

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Unknown 13 81%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 12 75%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,359,300
of 19,908,716 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,034
of 11,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,636
of 414,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,908,716 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.