↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Imaging modalities for the detection of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with obstructed defaecation syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Imaging modalities for the detection of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with obstructed defaecation syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011482.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabelle M A van Gruting, Aleksandra Stankiewicz, Ranee Thakar, Giulio A Santoro, Joanna IntHout, Abdul H Sultan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Researcher 8 8%
Lecturer 8 8%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 45 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Unspecified 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 46 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,693,106
of 23,452,723 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,652
of 12,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,377
of 433,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#113
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,452,723 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.