↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Imaging modalities for the detection of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with obstructed defaecation syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Imaging modalities for the detection of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with obstructed defaecation syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011482.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabelle M A van Gruting, Aleksandra Stankiewicz, Ranee Thakar, Giulio A Santoro, Joanna IntHout, Abdul H Sultan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 29%
Computer Science 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#10,568,795
of 19,529,814 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,197
of 11,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,564
of 341,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,529,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.