| Title |
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older people with hip fractures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007125.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen HG Handoll, Ian D Cameron, Jenson CS Mak, Claire E Panagoda, Terence P Finnegan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 12% |
| Spain | 6 | 10% |
| Japan | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Iceland | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 30 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 19% |
| Scientists | 8 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 244 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 7% |
| Researcher | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 16% |
| Unknown | 90 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 7% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 102 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2022.
All research outputs
#782,527
of 24,661,808 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,544
of 12,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,365
of 428,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,661,808 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.