↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Carbohydrates for improving the cognitive performance of independent‐living older adults with normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
Title
Carbohydrates for improving the cognitive performance of independent‐living older adults with normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007220.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheow Peng Ooi, Seng Cheong Loke, Zaitun Yassin, Tengku‐Aizan Hamid

Abstract

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an intermediate state between normal cognition and dementia in which daily function is largely intact. This condition may present an opportunity for research into the prevention of dementia. Carbohydrate is an essential and easily accessible macronutrient which influences cognitive performance. A better understanding of carbohydrate-driven cognitive changes in normal cognition and mild cognitive impairment may suggest ways to prevent or reduce cognitive decline.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 242 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 18%
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 48 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 9%
Psychology 19 8%
Social Sciences 15 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 61 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,544,510
of 26,617,918 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,089
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,959
of 123,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,617,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.