↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Growth hormone for in vitro fertilisation (IVF)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Growth hormone for in vitro fertilisation (IVF)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000099.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akanksha Sood, Gadha Mohiyiddeen, Gaity Ahmad, Cheryl Fitzgerald, Andrew Watson, Lamiya Mohiyiddeen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Other 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 15%
Unspecified 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,164,495
of 21,468,133 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,571
of 12,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,424
of 473,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,468,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.