The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Prolotherapy injections for chronic low‐back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004059.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Dagenais, Michael J Yelland, Chris Del Mar, Mark L Schoene |
| Abstract |
Prolotherapy involves repeated injections of irritant solutions to strengthen lumbosacral ligaments and reduce some types of chronic low-back pain; spinal manipulation and exercises are often used to enhance its effectiveness. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 241 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 16% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Researcher | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 44 | 18% |
| Unknown | 73 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 82 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2019.
All research outputs
#944,809
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,736
of 13,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,619
of 88,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.