The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Penicillin for secondary prevention of rheumatic fever
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002227 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juliet Manyemba, Bongani M Mayosi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 51 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 57 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,347,139
of 26,233,885 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,707
of 13,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,016
of 48,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,233,885 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.