↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for follow-up of women treated for breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
369 Mendeley
Title
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for follow-up of women treated for breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009553.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fary Khan, Bhasker Amatya, Louisa Ng, Marina Demetrios, Nina Y Zhang, Lynne Turner-Stokes

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women worldwide. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation aims to improve outcomes for women but the evidence base for its effectiveness is yet to be established.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
China 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 364 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 17%
Student > Bachelor 46 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 10%
Researcher 36 10%
Student > Postgraduate 20 5%
Other 72 20%
Unknown 93 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 116 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 17%
Psychology 29 8%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 39 11%
Unknown 103 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,207,083
of 21,342,999 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,675
of 12,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,906
of 281,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#292
of 489 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,342,999 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 489 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.