| Title |
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for follow‐up of women treated for breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009553.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fary Khan, Bhasker Amatya, Louisa Ng, Marina Demetrios, Nina Y Zhang, Lynne Turner-Stokes |
| Abstract |
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women worldwide. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation aims to improve outcomes for women but the evidence base for its effectiveness is yet to be established. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| Chile | 1 | 25% |
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 414 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 65 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 10% |
| Researcher | 39 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 74 | 18% |
| Unknown | 127 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 126 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 64 | 15% |
| Psychology | 29 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 9% |
| Unknown | 138 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,323,770
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,987
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,809
of 287,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.