↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Parenteral versus enteral fluid therapy for children hospitalised with bronchiolitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
28 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Parenteral versus enteral fluid therapy for children hospitalised with bronchiolitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013552.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter J Gill, Mohammed Rashidul Anwar, Emily Kornelsen, Patricia Parkin, Quenby Mahood, Sanjay Mahant

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 8 7%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Professor 4 4%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 60 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Psychology 3 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 68 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,220,427
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,571
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,306
of 514,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.