↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Parenteral versus enteral fluid therapy for children hospitalised with bronchiolitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
29 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Parenteral versus enteral fluid therapy for children hospitalised with bronchiolitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013552.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter J Gill, Mohammed Rashidul Anwar, Emily Kornelsen, Patricia Parkin, Quenby Mahood, Sanjay Mahant

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Unspecified 3 16%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 16%
Psychology 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,024,564
of 21,244,293 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,425
of 12,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,180
of 458,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,244,293 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.