↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Individual participant data meta‐analyses compared with meta‐analyses based on aggregate data

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
46 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Individual participant data meta‐analyses compared with meta‐analyses based on aggregate data
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000007.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catrin Tudur Smith, Maura Marcucci, Sarah J Nolan, Alfonso Iorio, Maria Sudell, Richard Riley, Maroeska M Rovers, Paula R Williamson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 140 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Researcher 13 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 4%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 48 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Psychology 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 57 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#864,944
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,684
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,169
of 345,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.