↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non‐eradication therapy (with or without long‐term maintenance antisecretory therapy) for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic…

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non‐eradication therapy (with or without long‐term maintenance antisecretory therapy) for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004062.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier P Gisbert, Sam Khorrami, Fernando Carballo, Xavier Calvet, Emili Gené, Enrique Dominguez‐Muñoz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Other 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 30 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 30 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2011.
All research outputs
#8,515,245
of 25,387,480 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,605
of 12,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,078
of 63,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.