↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of Kawasaki disease in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of Kawasaki disease in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richmal M Oates-Whitehead, J Harry Baumer, Linda Haines, Samantha Love, Ian K Maconochie, Amit Gupta, Kevin Roman, Jaspal S Dua, Ichiko Flynn

Abstract

Kawasaki disease is the most common cause of acquired heart disease in children in developed countries. The coronary arteries supplying the heart can be damaged in Kawasaki disease. The principal advantage of timely diagnosis is the potential to prevent this complication with early treatment. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is widely used for this purpose.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 111 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Other 17 15%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 26 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#875,120
of 17,595,144 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,268
of 11,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,886
of 255,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 523 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,595,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 523 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.