| Title |
The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all‐cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013139.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisette M Vernooij, Wilton A van Klei, Karel Gm Moons, Toshihiko Takada, Judith van Waes, Johanna Aag Damen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 46% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Poland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 50 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 59 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,211,055
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,640
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,181
of 514,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.