↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo…

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013139.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisette M Vernooij, Wilton A van Klei, Karel GM Moons, Toshihiko Takada, Judith van Waes, Johanna AAG Damen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Unspecified 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 18 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Unspecified 5 12%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 21 51%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,846,770
of 22,096,435 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,148
of 12,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,168
of 490,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,096,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 490,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.