| Title |
Dietary advice with or without oral nutritional supplements for disease-related malnutrition in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002008.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine Baldwin, Marian AE de van der Schueren, Hinke M Kruizenga, Christine Elizabeth Weekes |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 20% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Peru | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 226 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 18% |
| Unknown | 81 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 90 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,751,787
of 24,282,284 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,918
of 12,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,738
of 506,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,282,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.