↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to prevent injuries in construction workers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to prevent injuries in construction workers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006251.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henk F van der Molen, Marika M Lehtola, Jorma Lappalainen, Peter LT Hoonakker, Hongwei Hsiao, Roger Haslam, Andrew R Hale, Monique HW Frings-Dresen, Jos H Verbeek

Abstract

Construction workers are frequently exposed to various types of injury-inducing hazards. A number of injury prevention interventions have been proposed, yet their effectiveness is uncertain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Student > Master 22 17%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 27%
Engineering 20 16%
Social Sciences 14 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 26 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,207,230
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,771
of 12,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,792
of 278,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.