| Title |
Positive pressure therapy for Ménière’s disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015248 |
| Authors |
Katie E Webster, Natasha A Harrington-Benton, Owen Judd, Diego Kaski, Otto R Maarsingh, Samuel MacKeith, Jaydip Ray, Vincent A Van Vugt, Martin J Burton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 33% |
| Psychology | 1 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,968,240
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,218
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,000
of 521,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.