↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) and thermal ablation versus TACE alone for hepatocellular carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
The combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) and thermal ablation versus TACE alone for hepatocellular carcinoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013345.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

BoZhi Liu, YongChao Zhang, Hui Chen, Wei Li, Emmanuel Tsochatzis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Unspecified 9 9%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Researcher 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 51 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Unspecified 9 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 54 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2022.
All research outputs
#21,307,042
of 26,166,431 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,287
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#400,586
of 529,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#134
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,166,431 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.