↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) and thermal ablation versus TACE alone for hepatocellular carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
The combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) and thermal ablation versus TACE alone for hepatocellular carcinoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013345.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

BoZhi Liu, YongChao Zhang, Hui Chen, Wei Li, Emmanuel Tsochatzis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Other 5 6%
Unspecified 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Researcher 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 42 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Unspecified 5 6%
Psychology 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 45 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2022.
All research outputs
#20,669,432
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,897
of 11,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#388,192
of 515,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#104
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.