| Title |
Interventions for promoting the eruption of palatally displaced permanent canine teeth, without the need for surgical exposure, in children aged 9 to 14 years
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012851.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip E Benson, Amarpreet Atwal, Farhan Bazargani, Nicola Parkin, Bikram Thind |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Ireland | 2 | 29% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Greece | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 62 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 33% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 64 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,168,845
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,570
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,194
of 516,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.