↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for promoting the eruption of palatally displaced permanent canine teeth, without the need for surgical exposure, in children aged 9 to 14 years

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for promoting the eruption of palatally displaced permanent canine teeth, without the need for surgical exposure, in children aged 9 to 14 years
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012851.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip E Benson, Amarpreet Atwal, Farhan Bazargani, Nicola Parkin, Bikram Thind

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 6 5%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 71 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 32%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 73 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,168,845
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,570
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,194
of 516,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.