The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Heated tobacco products for smoking cessation and reducing smoking prevalence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013790.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harry Tattan-Birch, Jamie Hartmann-Boyce, Loren Kock, Erikas Simonavicius, Leonie Brose, Sarah Jackson, Lion Shahab, Jamie Brown |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 7% |
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Poland | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 95 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 96 | 72% |
| Scientists | 24 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 171 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 105 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 110 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 222. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2024.
All research outputs
#183,445
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#303
of 13,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,688
of 531,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.