The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Self‐management interventions for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002990.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jade Schrijver, Anke Lenferink, Marjolein Brusse-Keizer, Marlies Zwerink, Paul Dlpm van der Valk, Job van der Palen, Tanja W Effing |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 32% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| Grenada | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 70% |
| Scientists | 10 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 257 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 6% |
| Researcher | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 14% |
| Unknown | 144 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 12% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 147 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,026,920
of 26,411,386 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,882
of 13,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,584
of 534,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.